<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mikko Posts About Imagick in PHP and Fill Patterns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-mats.org/2008/04/mikko-posts-about-imagick-in-php-and-fill-patterns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-mats.org/2008/04/mikko-posts-about-imagick-in-php-and-fill-patterns/</link>
	<description>Where desperate is just another word for a regular day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mats</title>
		<link>http://e-mats.org/2008/04/mikko-posts-about-imagick-in-php-and-fill-patterns/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>mats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.lindh.no/~mats/wordpress/wordpress/?p=27#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The remark about GD wasn&#039;t really about fill patterns, but mostly about the general quality of the GD library compared to the Imagick library. If it wasn&#039;t clear, I&#039;ll change the wording a bit. There is however no secret that the GD library has it&#039;s troublesome past, both in design and maintenance history. 

Even if just making a fill pattern in GD is three lines of code, it does not increase the overall quality of the library (which, now as it has been adapted completely by PHP project (instead of maintaining two separate versions, as became necessary when GD development actually picked up again, and &quot;we&quot; were left with both a bundled version and a non-bundled version), actually have the potential to receive a quality boost).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The remark about GD wasn&#8217;t really about fill patterns, but mostly about the general quality of the GD library compared to the Imagick library. If it wasn&#8217;t clear, I&#8217;ll change the wording a bit. There is however no secret that the GD library has it&#8217;s troublesome past, both in design and maintenance history. </p>
<p>Even if just making a fill pattern in GD is three lines of code, it does not increase the overall quality of the library (which, now as it has been adapted completely by PHP project (instead of maintaining two separate versions, as became necessary when GD development actually picked up again, and &#8220;we&#8221; were left with both a bundled version and a non-bundled version), actually have the potential to receive a quality boost).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://e-mats.org/2008/04/mikko-posts-about-imagick-in-php-and-fill-patterns/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.lindh.no/~mats/wordpress/wordpress/?p=27#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Before saying that GD is crap, you may first RTFM.

What is described in this post is done in three lines of code using GD.

Get a clue, and fix your trackback too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Before saying that GD is crap, you may first RTFM.</p>
<p>What is described in this post is done in three lines of code using GD.</p>
<p>Get a clue, and fix your trackback too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

